Practice
Objective, standards-based review across operational, instructional, and administrative practice in law enforcement and corrections. Training programs are a separate engagement and are listed further down.
Force analysis requires looking beyond the moment of impact to understand the totality of circumstances, biomechanics, and legal precedent.
A training program is only as defensible as its underlying methodology.
Corrections environments present unique liability challenges that require highly specialized operational standards.
Firearms instruction and range safety require absolute precision in both execution and documentation.
Electronic Control Weapons and less-lethal impact and stun munitions are high-scrutiny tools that demand strict adherence to technical and policy guidelines.
Separate Engagement
Training is a separate engagement from expert work. I run two tracks, one for agencies and one for counsel. Retaining me on a case and booking a program are two different things.
Curriculum design, use of force documentation, and high-risk corrections protocols. Built for training commanders, academy directors, and agency instructors.
Reading a police training file, deposing the trainer, and evaluating force beyond the body camera. CLE style sessions, plaintiff or defense.
Commitment to Objectivity
My obligation is solely to the facts, the evidence, and established legal standards. I provide objective, standards-based analysis whether retained by plaintiff or defense counsel.
Initial case consultations are complimentary. Available to plaintiff and defense counsel nationwide.
Prefer your own email client? Reach out directly.
Available for retention nationwide.
* indicates required field
Submitting this form does not create a consulting or expert witness engagement, and information transmitted will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential. Please do not send case materials or discovery until a written engagement agreement is in place.
